whiteber.blogg.se

Neat video vs davinci resolve
Neat video vs davinci resolve









  1. #NEAT VIDEO VS DAVINCI RESOLVE 1080P#
  2. #NEAT VIDEO VS DAVINCI RESOLVE DRIVERS#
  3. #NEAT VIDEO VS DAVINCI RESOLVE PRO#

#NEAT VIDEO VS DAVINCI RESOLVE 1080P#

For one reason, it's the best NR software I use for still photographs, and having only 1080p as a maximum resolution limit would kill its use for photography purposes, where it's magical, even better than video results. Since you only work in 1080p that shouldn't be a problem right? no. OP: Don't get the Home edition, three reasons:ġ- It's limited to 1080p. I don't do it before editing, that would be frustrating having to wait, plus my tests showed much better results when it's applied after grading rather than before, Noise reduction is the slowest process in my workflow, so I do all my work, produce a ProRes file of the finished product, apply NR (and make different profiles for drastically different scenes) and just let it render, as a final last step, so it doesn't bother me even if it takes hours or a day. I don't think speed can be held against it since no other software does the same faster, and also as it depends on your machine. Bad news is I have to buy again as an owner of the older version V3.ĭeadcode: It's not fast, it is a heavy software to run, slightly heavier than all the other NR ones, but worth it of course. They also introduced a ''Professional Quality'' mode where it produces ''better NR results and preserves detail at the cost of 1.5x to 4x slower rendering''. Oh I just found out they introduced an entirely new product, Neat Video V4 claiming even higher performance and pretty bold claims on removing ''codec'' artefacts and even removing artefacts introduced by in-camera noise reduction, and claims it can remove dust, hairs, specks of footage shot on film entirely, as well as better performance with changing scenes by changing profiles gradually, they also claim better sharpening algorithm with reduced halos and digital artefacts (and its sharpening was great anyway yet halos were a bit problematic).

#NEAT VIDEO VS DAVINCI RESOLVE PRO#

Will I run into problems using it with Premiere Pro CC2015 on Mac?

neat video vs davinci resolve neat video vs davinci resolve

What's the real difference between Pro and Home for Neat (it says Home is for non commercial use but how will they know I denoised a commercial or something, honor-system?) Some people also said just get Denoiser from RedGiant cause it's cheaper (I have a college ID so would get educational discount).

#NEAT VIDEO VS DAVINCI RESOLVE DRIVERS#

So all these threads came up saying it has tons of problems with Mac graphic drivers and yada yada. I wanted to know if it's worth paying the extra 15bucks just get to work with higher res than 1080p. SO, I decided to just pay for it right away but stopped myself and goggled the product because it had a Home and Pro option.

neat video vs davinci resolve

It just deleted the noise like it was some kind of filter over my image keeping details that I didn't even saw because of the noise. But today, for fun, I downloaded Neat Video v4. So, I know I'm late to the party, but I've never used noise reduction applications for my NLE's.











Neat video vs davinci resolve